I think the obvious question would be what if the user changes his/her structure ? Adds, removes, renames a box ? Then maybe the way it is might be a lot better ?--EdOn 07/25/2012 01:34 AM, Tom Cross wrote: Hi Marijn We talked about this previously, Re archiving the mailbox structure by date. I would be interested in other users of surgemail thoughts please. Description: A user has a structure in surgeweb, all the standard folders and some extras. I have always thought it a good idea to have the ability to have the same structure in the archive folders. So if you archive every year, you click on 2009 and there is the same structure as your current folders but all mail is sent received, etc for 2009, or whatever the archive period. I like the way the archiving works now but it would be better if instead of just choosing InBox, Sent, Etc, you could choose "ALL". Ideas please.-- -----------------------------------------------------------EAS Enterprises LLCWorld Class Web and Email Hosting SolutionsIPv6 ready today for your needs of tomorrow!Ask us about dual-stacking your sitehttp://www.easent.net
Hi Marijn We talked about this previously, Re archiving the mailbox structure by date. I would be interested in other users of surgemail thoughts please. Description: A user has a structure in surgeweb, all the standard folders and some extras. I have always thought it a good idea to have the ability to have the same structure in the archive folders. So if you archive every year, you click on 2009 and there is the same structure as your current folders but all mail is sent received, etc for 2009, or whatever the archive period. I like the way the archiving works now but it would be better if instead of just choosing InBox, Sent, Etc, you could choose "ALL". Ideas please.
Last Message | Next Message