I don’t pretend to know about the economics involved, but I serve the graphics design and advertising industry, and SurgeWeb is, to put it mildly, an embarrassment from a purely visual standpoint.
There is simply no credible explanation for the current state of affairs except that NetWin does not have a designer on the team.
I love SurgeMail - it’s a great product at a great price with great support. The ease of administration is a major feature for me, and that is why I haven’t even looked at trying to modify the stock webmail skin. I run a small shop, and can’t justify the expense.
In a way I’m reminded of the old days with CommuniGate Pro, which I used to run before it migrated out of my price range. Its default webmail skin was similarly embarrassing, and I finally paid good money for a third-party skin that was clean and well-designed.
More than once I’ve been tempted to install Roundcube as an alternative webmail system, just so I don’t have to apologize for the design of SurgeWeb anymore. It would even be feasible to write a plugin for Roundcube to let users set up their autoresponders, which would handle 99% of the functionality required that is not included in the stock Roundcube distribution.
For suggestions as to how the design of SurgeWeb might be improved, just look at any of the numerous reskinnings Roundcube has seen over the past several years. Any of them would be a vast improvement as a general design language.
If I may say so, I believe I speak for a good proportion of SurgeMail users when I say that I wish NetWin would bring in a professional designer on a contract basis, perhaps just for several months, to thoroughly redesign SurgeWeb. The admin-facing web pages could certainly use some designer love as well, but that’s a much lower priority.
Best,
Chris
No not currently. At the moment we are keeping track of requests to see if there is a common theme or feature that really stands out, but we don't see change for changes sake as a good idea. Users tend to get very upset at interface changes and we would prefer the interface be stable and efficient and compatible with most browsers than flashy or 'fashionable' or using the latest mechanism which only works on browser 'x'. We have seen a lot of requests but we haven't to date seen a lot of requests that all pointed in the same direction :-)
So, intentionally no. But don't feel we are ignoring any ideas suggested.
ChrisP.
Is anyone externally or within Surgemail working on an interface update for Surgeweb?
