Indeed a spectacular failure, something must have gone wrong, could
you do this for me:
ChrisP.
Chirs,
Attached, also the before setting it on.
Looks like that the accuracy is less (maybe I interpret it wrong).
On the status page:
Neural Net Accuracy 0.0150, Bitfails 274/1389, Generation time -69
Steffen
From: Support
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 1:24 AM
To: surgemail-list@netwinsite.com
Subject: [SurgeMail List] Neural Network Beta
If anyone would like to beta test a slight improvement to the spam
handling then you may wish to try one of these:
http://netwinsite.com/ftp/misc/v1.zip
http://netwinsite.com/ftp/misc/l1.tar.gz
(binary files, rename your existing surgemail binary first, stop
surgemail, replace the binary, and restart)
Then set
g_sf_nnet "true"
then WAIT 30 MINUTES, then type in:
tellmail sf_compare >results.txt
and send me the results.txt file. Also let me know if you the spam
detection is better/worse/different over the next
couple of days.
This setting enables a Neural Network that is trained on the sample data
surgemail has gathered and figures out how to score messages based on the
various features
it detects. In our experiments this seems to give better results than the
existing more formal rule based system.
ChrisP.