SurgeMail Archive: Re: [SurgeMail List] Re: DKIM

Subject:	Re: [SurgeMail List] Re: DKIM
From:	Eddie W
Date:	12-Jul-2012
Any news on DKIM support. It seems that yahoo is not supporting domainkeys anymore and more sites are supporting the DKIM and not domainkeys. Thanks, Eddie W. Support ChrisP <surgemailHIDDEN@t@netwinsite.com> wrote: > > >It's on the todo list. But not at the top of it yet :-) (so many fun >things to do) > >I believe both gmail and yahoo still support domainkeys which >surgemail already supports. Please let me know if I"m wrong in that >belief :-) > >Personally I find spf easier to use/configure and will generally >produce the same results (as it gives the receiver the same ability to >trust that it is your reputation related to >those servers / messages, weather they decide your reputation is >good/bad or not is then up to them in either case) > > ChrisP. > > > >On Wednesday 08/06/2011 at 5:16 am, surgemailHIDDEN@etwinsite.com >wrote: >> "Eddie Wieder" HIDDEN@ail@planetmars.org> wrote: >>> >>> >> Hi there, >> >> We're looking at deploying DKIM to help delivery rates with operators >> like Yahoo and GMail if/when something comes up due to a customer >> being naughyt (usually with a forward with no spam protection). >> >> Has there been any movement on this? I reached this thread via Google >> and it looks like there's been nothing since March. Apologies if I >> just haven't found the right place >> >> Thanks >> Ross Halliday >> WTC Communications > > > ><html> ><head> ><style> > .sw_message P{margin:0px;padding:0px;} > .sw_message {FONT-SIZE: 12pt;FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;background:white;} ></style> ></head> ><body class=3d"sw_message"> >It's on the todo list. �But not at the top of it yet :-) (so many fun >t= >hings to do)�<div><br></div><div>I believe both gmail and yahoo still >s= >upport domainkeys which surgemail already supports. � Please let me kno= >w if I"m wrong in that belief :-)�</div><div><br></div><div>Personally >= >I find spf easier to use/configure and will generally produce the same resul= >ts (as it gives the receiver the same ability to trust that it is your reput= >ation related to</div><div>those servers / messages, weather they decide you= >r reputation is good/bad or not is then up to them in either case)�</di= >v><div><br></div><div>� � � ChrisP.</div><div><br><div><br><b= >r><div id=3d"editor_signature"></div>On Wednesday 08/06/2011 at 5:16 am, sur= >gemailHIDDEN@etwinsite.com wrote: <blockquote type=3d"cite">"Eddie Wieder" >&= >ltHIDDEN@ail@planetmars.org> wrote:<br><blockquote type=3d"cite"><br></bl= >ockquote>Hi there,<br><br>We're looking at deploying DKIM to help delivery >r= >ates with operators like Yahoo and GMail if/when something comes up due to >a= > customer being naughyt (usually with a forward with no spam protection).<br= >><br>Has there been any movement on this? I reached this thread via Google >a= >nd it looks like there's been nothing since March. Apologies if I just haven= >'t found the right place<br><br>Thanks<br>Ross Halliday<br>WTC Communication= >s<br></blockquote><br></div></div> ></body></html> > > >

Last Message | Next Message


Search website: